Chinese President visit

Prime Minister Muhammad Nawaz Sharif hand shake with Chinese President.

Democracy WINS - Pakistan WINS!

Wall street Journal news about democratic Pakistan

PCEC map

This is the original and only map of PCEC.

Mass Transit Bus Projects

Rawalpindi Metro Project

PM meets King Salman

Pakitan stands beside Saudia for its soverignity

Reduction in fares of public transport

Toll free helpline for compaints

Parliament Gallery

Group Photo| Speaker NA Sardar Ayaz Sadiq with Dr. Cyrill Nunn, Ambassador of Germany and Members of Pakistan-Germany Parliamentary Friendship Group

News reel

Followers

Tuesday, September 8, 2015

In Pakistan, a prime minister and a country rebound — at least for now

In Pakistan, a prime minister and a country rebound — at least for now

— One year after he was nearly bounced from office, Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has hung on amid signs the country could be on the cusp of a surprising turnaround.
After years of terrorist attacks, military coups and political upheaval, Pakistan for now has settled into a period of relative calm. Over the past nine months, government statistics show, major terrorist attacks have declined 70 percent, and Pakistanis are flocking back to shopping malls, resorts and restaurants.
The relaxed and optimistic mood here is benefiting Sharif politically, despite the humiliation he faced a year ago when he had to cede a chunk of his power to Pakistan’s military. Still, the arrangement is allowing Sharif to do something that Pakistani leaders have struggled to accomplish for much of the past decade: implement a road map for what a peaceful, stable Pakistan could look like. And in the process, Sharif is winning over skeptics despite his low-key leadership style.
“People are feeling more secure. There are development projects, and the perspective of people is changing to say, ‘Okay, now we can see things are going well,’ ” said Zafar Mueen Nasir, dean of business studies at the Pakistan Institute of Development Economics. “Of course, there will always be some criticism and always a second opinion, but as far as I am concerned, this government is at least showing some progress.”
Last summer, after Sharif’s first year in office was marked by disputes with political rivals and the country’s powerful military, tens of thousands of protesters camped out near his mansion, demanding his resignation. At the time, there was widespread speculation that military leaders were considering a coup to oust Sharif over his diplomatic outreach to Pakistan’s arch rival, India.
But as Islamabad slipped into an unusually chilly fall, Sharif outlasted the protesters. To remain in office, he reportedly had to make significant concessions to military commanders, including giving them full authority to make major decisions related to government policy toward Afghanistan and India.
Now, despite his reduced power, Sharif has turned his attention toward trying to rebuild a chronically sluggish economy while also delivering shiny new amenities for residents.
It’s a strategy that has become easier to implement this year, as a military campaign in Pakistan’s tribal belt and its largest city, Karachi, has been credited with reducing terrorist attacks and other crimes.
In the first eight months of this year, 680 civilians have been killed in terrorist attacks, compared with 1,194 in the same period last year and 2,246 in 2013, according to the South Asia Terrorism Portal, which monitors violence in the region.
A rapidly growing country of 180 million, Pakistan has plenty of obstacles to overcome.
Energy shortages can keep the lights out for hours at a time, even in wealthy neighborhoods. Tens of millions of children suffer from poor nutrition, unsafe drinking water and sporadic access to medical care. The average Pakistani makes just $1,513 per year; many can’t find jobs. And Pakistan still has unsettled relations with India and Afghanistan, both of which accuse it of using favored terrorist groups as proxies to destabilize its neighbors.
Pakistan’s bare-knuckled political system also remains unsettled. Sharif, who still has 2 ½ years remaining in his term, will continue to face relentless challenges from political rivals eager to exploit the next crisis.
But in recent months, speculation about a civil war or an economic collapse has died down. Instead, credit agencies are boosting Pakistan’s bond ratingsand large investment firms are advising clients to take a second look at opportunities here.
“It is the best, undiscovered investment opportunity in emerging or frontier markets,” Charlie Robertson, London-based chief economist at Renaissance Capital, told Bloomberg News in late June.
The International Monetary Fund, which has extended a $6.2 billion loan, released a report last month crediting Pakistan for its 4.1 percent growth in gross domestic product this year, with a bump up to 4.5 percent projected for next year.
Many economists and analysts, however, remain skeptical that Pakistan’s economy and government have truly turned a corner toward happier, more prosperous times. They note that past moments of stability have been quickly disrupted by tragedy, scandal or an investor-rattling political or military crisis.
“I still don’t really see many reasons for real optimism,” said Frederic Grare, director of the South Asia Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. “The economic situation is better right now, but the economic situation is better for almost everybody because energy is cheap.”
Sharif, however, has started delivering on his promise to make life a bit easier for Pakistan’s middle class, which for decades has endured substandard transportation, housing and employment options.
A millionaire business tycoon who also served two terms as prime minister in the 1990s, Sharif is promising to build 800 miles of highways and 14 power plants by 2018.
Several of the projects are designed to accommodate a major expansion of Chinese investment in Pakistan. China is hoping to use Pakistani roads and ports to open up new trading routes via the Arabian Sea, which could also help Pakistan expand its manufacturing base.
Although that partnership might take decades to reach its potential, Sharif is also implementing shorter-term goals to improve life for Pakistanis.
In May, Sharif inaugurated a 14-mile rapid-bus system connecting the relatively affluent capital of Islamabad to the working-class town of Rawalpindi. A month earlier, the government introduced new cross-country, deluxe train service featuring air-conditioning, WiFi and televisions.
The Islamabad airport, consistently ranked as one of the most outdated in the world, has been upgraded with spiffier ticket counters, air-conditioned shuttle buses and its first fast-food restaurant.
“This government is far better, compared to previous governments,” Dilawar Ali, a 43-year-old engineer, said as he shopped at a market in Islamabad. “Look at these Metro bus projects, these roads and bridges. We could only imagine such things when we were in school and college kids.”
But Salman Zaidi, deputy director of the nonpartisan Jinnah Institute, said a closer examination of Sharif’s record still leaves major questions about his leadership style.
The prime minister, who declined to be interviewed for this article, lacks the forceful persona needed to become a unifying leader in a country with eight major political parties, Zaidi said. Sharif’s overall approach to governing, he said, is also outdated.
“He has a mind-set that comes from the 1950s, where large infrastructure projects equal development, and I think we have moved several decades beyond that,” Zaidi said. “A better estimation of a politician’s ability is ability to deliver on the ground in terms of education, in terms of justice, in terms of health care.”
Marvin Weinbaum, a Pakistan expert at the Middle East Institute in Washington, said there is also broad disappointment that Sharif hasn’t been able to do more to curb the electricity shortage or to overhaul a government bureaucracy that numbers 650,000 employees.
“Yes, Pakistan has stabilized, but it’s stabilized because the military said to Nawaz, ‘Okay, if you want to stay in power, you are going to play by our rules,’ ” Weinbaum said. Sharif, he added, “is not seen as a real reformer.”
In Karachi, which generates a quarter of Pakistan’s GDP, business leaders are also angered by Sharif’s efforts to broaden Pakistan’s tax base — a key demand of the IMF and other creditors. Pakistani farmers are nervous about sluggish exports.
Still, for the broader Pakistani public, the country finally appears to be waking up after a decade-long slumber.
After the Ramadan holiday ended in mid-July, surprising numbers of Pakistanis flocked to Himalayan mountain resort towns, overwhelming highways and hotels.
Last month, the largest crowd in years filled Islamabad’s streets to celebrate Pakistan’s Independence Day.
In Peshawar, where the Pakistani Taliban killed about 150 teachers and students at a school in December, merchants are also reporting an increase in business as violence waned this year.
“No doubt, business activities are encouraging,” said Haji Khanan, a 50-year-old shop owner in Karkhano Market, on the edge of Peshawar near Pakistan’s once-unruly tribal belt. “You can see for yourself. Look, there are no free spaces available for parked cars.”
Whether Pakistan’s momentum can be sustained, however, is a question most Pakistanis are hesitant to answer.
“It’s 10 p.m., and I am here shopping with my kids and wife, and in previous years I would not be going out at this late hour,” Arif Khaliq, 43, said while buying back-to-school shoes. “Now, will this last? That is to be seen. . . . We can only pray.”
Tim Craig is The Post’s bureau chief in Pakistan. He has also covered conflicts in Iraq, Afghanistan and within the District of Columbia government.

 



 

Tuesday, August 25, 2015

Ayyaz Sadiq interview for Capital Talk

Interview | Sardar Ayyaz Sadiq

http://pkpolitics.com/2015/08/24/capital-talk-24-aug-2015/

برادرم ایاز صادق کیلئے ”جھوٹی“ باتیں

 برادرم ایاز صادق کیلئے ”جھوٹی“ باتیں

  ڈاکٹر محمد اجمل نیازی

برادرم ایاز صادق نے سپیکر کے طور پر ساری مراعات واپس کر دی ہیں۔ انہوں نے اپنے سیکرٹریٹ کو ہدایات جاری کی ہیں کہ میرے زیراستعمال گاڑی پروٹوکول سکیورٹی وغیرہ اور سب کچھ حکومت کو واپس کر دیا جائے۔ یہ بہت بڑی بات ہے اور اس کے لیے میں انہیں مبارکباد پیش کرتا ہوں۔ ورنہ ہمارے ہاں یہ رواج نہیں ہے۔ لوگ اپنے سرکاری بنگلوں سے بہت سی ”چیزیں“ اپنے ساتھ لے جاتے ہیں۔ کچھ چیزیں جو وہ پہلے سے اپنے پاس رکھتے ہیں واپس کر کے سرکاری ”چیزیں“ لے لیتے ہیں اور واپس نہیں کرتے۔ کئی لوگ قالین بھی ساتھ لے جاتے ہیں کہ ان پر لیٹنے کا زیادہ مزہ آتا ہے۔ 
ہمارے ایک نااہل وزیراعظم یوسف رضا گیلانی وزیراعظم ہاﺅس سے کئی چیزیں ساتھ لے گئے۔ کچھ چیزیں ایوان صدر ”صدر“ زرداری نے انہیں دے دی تھیں کہ لوگوں کی نظروں سے بچا کے رکھنا۔ ایک بہت قیمتی ہار ترک خاتون اول نے سیلاب زدگان کی حالت زار دیکھ کر اپنے گلے سے اتار کر دے دیا تھا۔ وہ گیلانی صاحب نے اپنی بیٹی کے گلے میں ڈال دیا۔ پھر کچھ مدت کے بعد میڈیا کے واویلے کے بعد وہ ہار واپس کیا گیا۔ اسے لوگوں نے گیلانی صاحب کی اخلاقی ہار قرار دیا۔ ایسے سیاستدان اخلاق کو نہیں جانتے۔ اخلاقی ہار سے بھی واقف نہیں ہوں گے۔ سنا ہے کہ ایسے ہی کسی موقع پر گیلانی صاحب نے کہا تھا کہ میں اخلاق نام کے کسی آدمی کو نہیں جانتا۔
ایاز صادق نے کہا کہ الیکشن کمشن کا فیصلہ کسی کی جیت ہے نہ کسی کی ہار ہے۔ ہم سارے قانونی معاملات کو جانتے ہیں مگر اپنا حق ضرور استعمال کریں گے۔ وہ بھی برادرم خواجہ سعد رفیق کی طرح stay order لے لیں گے۔ اسی طرح کا فیصلہ خواجہ صاحب کے لیے آیا پھر نجانے کدھر گیا۔ وہ بڑے دھڑلے سے وزیر ہیں۔ وہ ہیں بھی دھڑلے کے آدمی۔ بہت بڑے شہید باپ کے بیٹے ان کے بھائی خواجہ سلمان رفیق کی نرم خوئی اور خاکساری دیکھ کر کچھ لوگوں کو یقین نہیں آتا کہ دونوں بھائی ہیں؟ برادرم رﺅف طاہر خواجہ صاحب سے بڑھ کر ان کے وکیل ہیں۔ مجھے لگتا ہے کہ ایاز صادق قومی اسمبلی کے آخری حتمی فیصلے تک سپیکر کی کرسی پر نہیں بیٹھیں گے۔ ان کی اور خواجہ صاحب کی پوزیشن میں بہت فرق ہے۔ یہ بھی ان کی سیاسی بڑائی ہو گی ورنہ یہاں تو پوری پوری حکومتیں سٹے آرڈر پر چلتی رہتی ہیں۔
ایاز صادق نے آغاز ہی سے چار حلقوں کے حوالے سے تحریک انصاف کی طرف سے بڑی بڑی باتوں کے جواب میں بڑے باوقار طریقے سے ایک طرز عمل اختیار کیا۔ کوئی عامیانہ بات نہ کی۔ ردعمل تو ان کی کسی بات میں نہ تھا جبکہ ہمارے اکثر سیاستدان ردعمل کو ردی عمل بنا دیتے ہیں۔
ان کو قومی اسمبلی کا سپیکر بنایا گیا تو یہ بھی ان کی معتدل اور ممتاز شخصیت کو دیکھتے ہوئے بنایا گیا تھا اور انہوں نے بہت شاندار اور بااعتبار طریقے سے ایوان کو چلایا۔ کسی کو ان سے شکایت پیدا نہ ہوئی۔ حتیٰ کہ حکومتی پارٹی کے کسی وزیر شذیر کو شکایت نہ ہوئی۔ صرف برادرم شیخ محمد رشید خفا ہوئے۔ وہ کہتے ہیں مجھے بولنے نہ دیا گیا۔ کسی کی مجال ہے کہ انہیں بولنے نہ دے۔ وہ ہمیں کہتے تو ہم ایاز صادق کے سامنے جا کے نعرے لگاتے۔ یہ نعرے لگانے کی عادت ہمیں بول ٹی وی کے محاذ پر آزادی صحافت کے لیے لگانے سے پڑی۔ بول کو بولنے دو اور اب بول رہا ہے۔ بہت بڑے انسان سلمان اقبال نے حکومت اور بول والوں کی مدد کے لیے ایک پلان بنایا۔ اللہ کرے آزادی صحافت کا پرچم ہمیشہ بلند رہے۔ برادرم خاور نعیم ہاشمی نے آزادی صحافت کی تحریک کے لئے عمر بھر جدوجہد کی ہے۔ اب بھی ان کی قیادت میں تحریک چلائی گئی۔
ایاز صادق نے الیکشن ٹربیونل کے فیصلے کے لیے بڑے حوصلہ اور بردباری کا ثبوت دیا ہے۔ شیخ رشید سے گذارش ہے کہ وہ ہتھ ہولا رکھیں۔ عمران خان نے باتیں تو بہت کی ہیں مگر ایاز صاحب کے لیے اچھے تاثرات کا اظہار کیا ہے۔ یہ دونوں کے لیے مبارکباد کی بات ہے۔
یہ پارٹی کا فیصلہ تھا مگر مجھے یقین ہے کہ جونہی عمران خان نے چار حلقوں کو کھولنے کا مطالبہ کیا تھا تو ایاز صادق کبھی انکار نہ کرتے۔ دیر بھی نہ کرتے۔ ان کے صاحبزادے علی ایاز جوان ہیں۔ ان کا لہجہ کبھی کبھی سخت ہوتا ہے۔ ایاز صادق کا نہیں ہوتا۔ انہوں نے جس اچھے اور کھلے انداز میں برادرم کامران شاہد سے باتیں کیں۔ وہ قابل تعریف ہیں جبکہ اس پروگرام میں ڈاکٹر بابر اعوان نے بہت طاقت اور اعتماد سے بات کی۔ برادرم مجیب شامی اور سلمان غنی بھی سب چیزوں کو سمجھنے سمجھانے کے انداز میں بات کر رہے تھے۔ ن لیگ والے اس فیصلے کے بعد اگلی سیاست کے لیے ایاز صادق سے مسلسل مشورہ کریں گے تو بات بنی رہے گی۔
چند ہفتے پہلے ایاز صادق نے میرے ساتھ بات کی اور بتایا کہ میں اپنے حلقے کے لوگوں کے ساتھ مسلسل رابطے میں رہتا ہوں۔ آپ کا گھر بھی اس راستے پر آتا ہے۔ اور ایک دن وہ اچانک میرے گھر میں آ گئے۔ میں حیران ہوا کہ وہ خود کار ڈرائیو کر کے آئے تھے۔ ان کے ساتھ پروٹوکول تو تھا ہی نہیں۔ سکیورٹی کا ایک آدمی بھی ساتھ نہ تھا۔ اس طرح کی صورتحال میں نے برادرم پرویز رشید کے حوالے سے دیکھی ہے۔ وہ تو بالکل ان باتوں کی پرواہ نہیں کرتے۔ نہ پروٹوکول نہ سکیورٹی۔ وہ مجھ سے خفا رہتے ہیں۔ شاید انہیں خود بھی پتہ نہیں کہ کیوں؟ میں بھی پٹھان ہوں۔ پٹھان اہل قلم ہو تو کیا ہوتا ہے۔ اس کے لیے جوش ملیح آبادی کو پہلے پڑھیں اور پھر کالموں پر نظر ڈالیں۔
گارڈن کالج راولپنڈی میں وہ میرے پاس میری کلاس میں تھے۔ شیخ رشید بھی تھا۔ پورے کالج میں کوئی فارسی پڑھانے والا نہ ملا تو مجھے بی اے کی فارسی آپشنل کی کلاس دے دی گئی جو لازمی مضمون تھا۔ ایک بار برادرم افتخار احمد سے یہی بات پرویز رشید نے بتائی تو میں نے کہا کہ فارسی تو دونوں رشیدوں نے مجھ سے پڑھی مگر تیل میں بیچتا پھرتا ہوں۔اور اب اس تیل کا خریدار بھی کوئی نہیں ہے۔ ہمارے معاشرے سے فارسی کا ذوق ختم ہونے کا بہت رنج ہے، فارسی ہماری تہذیبی زبان ہے۔


 

Thursday, August 20, 2015

Roshan Pakistan | K2 inagurated at KANUPP

Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif addresses the inauguration ceremony of K-2 power plant. —DawnNews screengrab
Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif addresses the inauguration ceremony of K-2 power plant. —DawnNews screengrab
Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif inaugurates K-2 power plant, the largest in the country. —DawnNews screengrab
Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif inaugurates K-2 power plant, the largest in the country. —DawnNews screengrab
Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif addresses the inauguration ceremony of K-2 power plant. —DawnNews screengrab
Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif addresses the inauguration ceremony of K-2 power plant. —DawnNews screengrab
Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif inaugurates K-2 power plant, the largest in the country. —DawnNews screengrab
Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif inaugurates K-2 power plant, the largest in the country. —DawnNews screengrab
KARACHI: Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif on Thursday inaugurated the K-2 power project at the Karachi Nuclear Power Plant (Kanupp) during his one-day visit to Karachi.
K-2 power plant, the largest in the country, will generate 1,100MW electricity upon completion.
Nawaz congratulated the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission on the timely start of concrete pouring of K-2 power plant, which will be built by the China National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC).
Terming the occasion an "important day in Pakistan's history", the prime minister said the project was evidence of cooperation between Pakistan and China in the field of science and technology.
"The construction of K-2 and K-3 power plants will further strengthen the steadfast friendship between the two nations," Nawaz said.
The prime minister thanked the Chinese government, CNNC, and other Chinese organisations for their cooperation in the construction of nuclear power plants.
The groundbreaking of K-2 and K-3 power plants was performed by the prime minister in November last year.
The World Nuclear Association had earlier estimated the cost of the new project at nearly $10 billion.
The project had been in the media spotlight for quite some time with representatives of civil society organisations raising a number of reservations over it, with the chief concern being the close proximity of the project to the city.

Upon his arrival to Karachi, the premier was received by Sindh Governor Dr Ishratul Ibad and Chief Minister Syed Qaim Ali Shah.

PM Nawaz briefed about Karachi operation

After the inauguration ceremony at Kanupp, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif is currently chairing a high-level meeting of the apex committee to review the city’s law and order situation.
Also attending the meeting are Defence Minister Khawaja Asif, Interior Minister Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan, State Minister for Water and Power Abid Sher Ali, Rangers Director General (DG) Major Gen Bilal Akbar, Corps Commander Karachi Lt Gen Naveed Mukhtar and other high level officials.
During the meeting, the prime minister was briefed the progress of ongoing Karachi operation, which was launched in September 2013 to free the city of criminals and people associated with terrorist outfits.
Sindh Chief Minister Qaim Ali Shah and Governor Ishratul Ibad also briefed the premier about the implementation of decisions taken by the apex committee with regards to Karachi operation.
Later in the day, the prime minister will also meet with representatives of the city's Parsi community during his one-day visit, according to a reportpublished on the Radio Pakistan website.



Monday, August 17, 2015

Putting railways back on track in Pakistan

Putting railways back on track in Pakistan

The latest statistics from Pakistan Railways paint a disappointing picture. Down from a 100 million passengers, Pakistan Railways carried a mere 47 million passengers in the 2013-14 fiscal year. —AFP
The latest statistics from Pakistan Railways paint a disappointing picture. Down from a 100 million passengers, Pakistan Railways carried a mere 47 million passengers in the 2013-14 fiscal year. —AFP
Thinking fast and slow is what Daniel Kahneman, the Nobel Laureate in Economics, thinks humans do. Planning fast and moving slow is what Pakistan Railways does.
With cumulative liabilities reaching 74 billion Rupees, Pakistan Railways is one state-owned enterprise that has not delivered a profit in ages. Despite when revenues increase, the expenses increase even faster, returning even bigger annual losses.
With such a dismal outlook, optimism still abounds at the Prime Minister’s Secretariat where plans for a high-speed rail link between Peshawar and Karachi have taken root.
One wonders when Pakistan has failed in running slow trains, how can it succeed in running fast ones. Wouldn’t planning fast and moving slow be yet another failed experiment with Pakistan Railways?
In April 2014, Pakistan Railways took out a half-page advertisement in The Financial Times soliciting interest in a high-speed rail link. The Sunday Timesreported the 6.6 billion pound project would reduce the travel time for the 700-mile journey from 18 to seven hours. The cost may seem high. However, at $10 million per km, it appears comparable to other similar projects in developing countries.
Source: http://www.railway-technical.com/finance.shtml.
Source: http://www.railway-technical.com/finance.shtml.
High-speed rails in Pakistan are not going to be as fast as the French TGV or the Japanese Shinkansen, which operate at speeds over 300 km/h. A conservative estimate of the average operating speed for the high-speed rail in Pakistan is between 150 to 200 km/h.
It may not sound impressive, but this is the average operating train speeds in Canada and the US. If the trains in Pakistan can run at 150 km/h, train riders will be as fast and furious as their North American counterparts.
However, it is important to have a look at how Pakistan Railways veered off-track.
The bad ways of Railways
Nisar Ahmed Abro, a Station in-charge in Sindh, knows intimately well of what ails Pakistan Railways. Speaking to The New York Times in 2013, Mr. Abro quipped: “The railways are the true image of our country. If you want to see Pakistan, see its railways.” Mr. Abro has made the right prognosis. There is nothing more wrong with the Railways than what is already wrong with Pakistan and its other public sector utilities.
Corruption, mismanagement, nepotism, and lack of professional expertise plague the Railways and other relics of a fast shrinking public sector in Pakistan.
It is important to understand that Pakistan Railways is dying a slow death. In the process, its assets are shrinking and so is the level and scope of services the Railway provides.
In 1986, the consulting arm of the Canadian Pacific Railways won a contract to propose specifications for a computerised management information system. The Globe and Mail in Canada highlighted the deal and reported that Pakistan Railways operated 8,800 km of track and carried 11 million tonnes of freight and 100 million passengers.
That was then.
The latest statistics from Pakistan Railways paint a disappointing picture. Down from a 100 million passengers, Pakistan Railways carried a mere 47 million passengers in the 2013-14 fiscal year. From 11 million tonnes of freight in 1986, the volume was down to 1.6 million tonnes. Despite the drastic decline in services, Railways still carried a workforce of 80,000 employees.
The Railways finally got around to computerising parts of its information management in November 2007 when the electronic ticketing system was launched. Recall, Canadians were awarded a contract in 1986 to do its feasibility. It took Railways only 21 years to take the next step. However, the system remained operational for a mere three months! It was back to the good old days and the good old ways for Railways.
Railways infrastructure is insufficient to meet the demand and is in poor state. To help move a nation of 180 million, Pakistan Railways has fewer than 500 locomotives of which only 20 per cent are operational. The rest are either too old or too damaged to operate.
Railways’ own records show that even in the early 80s, the locomotive fleet stood at over 950 and the number of passenger coaches exceeded 2,370. By 2013-14, Railways was left with only 1,434 coaches. Also, Railways in the early 80s loaded, on average, 600,000 freight wagons. By 2013-14, that number was down to 76,300.
It is quite convenient to blame the political administration and bureaucrats for the sorry state of Railways’ affairs. This, however, will be wrong. The very masses, who suffer at the hands of Railways, seldom miss an opportunity to destroy the very infrastructure that they desperately need and have paid for with their taxes.
After the death of Benazir Bhutto, enraged masses torched 137 coaches and 22 locomotives. In addition, terrorist violence and accidents have destroyed even more infrastructure.
The state of Railways affairs is so bad that one cannot tell with certainty the extent of financial losses. At the same time, the political operatives are keen to deliver the good news about the Railways.
Last July, a senior administrator boasted to the media of generating 25 billion Rupees in revenue in 2013-14, resulting in an “increase of Rs 7 billion in the national kitty,” wrote a newspaper.
There is, however, a problem. The Auditor General of Pakistan (AGP) is not equally enthralled about the Railways’ performance. The AGP’s annual report raises alarm about the Railways’ losses surging to 32.5 billion Rupees for the same fiscal year.
The AGP reported the gross earnings to be 22.8, and not 25, billion Rupees against 55.3 billion Rupees in operating working expenditure. It is true that Railways earned more in 2013-14 than it did in 2012-13. However, its expenses rose as well, negating the benefits of increased revenues.
The looming losses did not deter the government from boasting to the IMF of a stellar Railways performance. In a letter of intent addressed to the IMF’s managing director, the government claimed to have improved Railways’ “revenue in FY 2013/14 by 32 per cent.” Never mind, Railways own published statistics reveal a 26 per cent increase in revenue over the last fiscal year.
The government further claims to have “increased revenue by over 50 per cent in the first nine months of FY 2014/15.” There is no mention in the letter of the mounting expenditures against the increased revenues.
How to put railways back on track
Given the culture of entitlement that lets college students ride public transit free or political patronage that keeps adding unneeded employees to the Railways’ bloated workforce, it is rather naïve to hope for a turnaround in Pakistan Railways with structural reforms.
The skills needed to revitalise a restructured Railways do not exist with the employees or the administrators.
There is no option, but to privatise Pakistan Railways. The inevitable privatisation can only be delayed, but not avoided. The downside of the delay is that vested interests will be able to scavenge even more Railways assets.
Remember, Railways today is merely a shadow of what it once was. Its land holdings, operating fleet of locomotives and cars has shrunk. It carries much fewer passengers and freight today than it did even two decades ago.
The attempts to privatise Railways always end up in the Superior Courts where Railways employees argue for their God-given right to a public sector employment. The Superior Courts must consider the balance between the welfare of the 180-million individuals against the employment guarantee for the 80,000 Pakistan Railway employees who are responsible for an increase of billions of Rupees each year to the nation’s collective debt.
Courts have also shown concern for low-income commuters who may be forced to pay higher fares under privatised rail operations. This indeed, is a valid concern.
However, it does not require the State to run Railways. The Benazir Income Support Programme is a good example of subsiding low-income households that could be expanded to include commuting subsidies so that the government is freed from running trains, flying planes, and steering buses.
In the interim, when the battle to privatise Railways continues, one can restructure Railways to slow down, if not reverse, the rot.
The breakdown of expenses reveals that Railways spends a large sum on maintenance and administration. This can be addressed by segmenting the Railways into smaller functional units with transparent administrative setups.
For instance, the passenger and freight operations may be segregated into independent entities, namely Pakistan Passenger Railways and Pakistan Freight Railways. The locomotives may be divided as per the current demand for service for freight and passenger transportation. The passenger cars and freight wagons are easy to assign. The maintenance departments should be consolidated under a separate independent entity that would serve both Freight and Passenger Railways.
Source: Data retrieved from Pakistan Railways annual report.
Source: Data retrieved from Pakistan Railways annual report.
The government has already established Real Estate Development & Marketing Company (REDMCO) to manage and exploit the potential of whatever is left of the Railways public lands.
I recommend that the existing railway tracks, the accompanying rights-of-way, and other immobile assets, including Stations be consolidated under REDMCO with the goal for the entity to be an asset manager rather than one with the sole mandate to dispose of land to speculators.
Even with privatisation, it may be prudent to maintain railway stations and tracks under the public sector to allow late entrants from the private sector to make competitive bids for the use of the same infrastructure.
If the tracks, rights-of-way, and stations are privatised, they will result in new private sector monopolies who will have little incentive to be efficient or cost effective.
Think of the tracks as Motorways. Imagine if the Motorways were sold to Daewoo, who could have refused to allow competition to operate buses and trucks. Operating efficiencies would have declined and user costs increased as a result.
A good starting point towards privatisation will be to abolish the Ministry of Railways. Railway ministries do not exist in developed countries. Even in European countries where rail transportation is much more pronounced, railways are not a standalone ministry. By abolishing the Ministry of Railways, one can eliminate the administrative redundancy that exists between the Ministry and Pakistan Railways.
A Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure should amalgamate the collective portfolios of Ministry of Railways, Ministry of Ports and Shipping, and Ministry of Housing and Works. This will not only save costs but also improve operating efficiencies by ensuring better coordination between inter-related departments and corporations that are spread across several ministries. Pakistan Railways and PIA could both be under the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure until such time that these entities are privatised.
Railways should also be forced to abandon all tangential operations that are not core to its mission. For its employees and their dependents, Railways run numerous hospitals and schools. These are the non-productive use of Railways’ capital and other assets/infrastructure.
These facilities should be handed over (better sold) to respective municipal and provincial authorities. Instead of operating these large establishments at a financial loss, Railways should instead provide health insurance to its employees and education grants to low-income employees. The trade-off will result in savings and, more importantly, it will help the Railways to focus more on its core mission.
Doing the same without success for years and hoping for a better outcome in the future is a clear sign of administrative and imaginative failure. Whatever the State has done, under a variety of civilian and military regimes, it has failed to stop bleeding at Pakistan Railways.
A gradual and sustained series of steps, starting with restructuring and ending with privatisation, are a must.
If not, be prepared to assume billions more in national debt to keep the 80,000 Railway employees working in the public sector.



Wednesday, August 12, 2015

PMLN MPA working side by side with the people of Rajanpur

Thursday, July 2, 2015

Schooling and social change | A column by Mian Nawaz Sharif PM

 Schooling and social change


The importance of education — and especially schooling — cannot be overestimated. Not only has the expansion of primary and secondary education been linked to accelerated economic growth, poverty eradication and improved income equality, but education also appears to be closely associated with social enrichment and inclusion, the upgrading of human capital, increased opportunities, and enhanced freedom and welfare. That is why, as Pakistan’s prime minister, I have placed universal access to education very high on the national agenda.
Education influences the way people perceive the world around them, understand issues, and find solutions to their problems. It makes them more aware of their rights and duties and affects how they interact within their communities and with the state and its institutions. Above all, it enables them to think critically and question established wisdom, thereby enabling them to rise above prejudice, myth and restrictive historical legacies.
In this sense, education is a major driver of social progress. And it is the key to fulfilling my promise, made when I took office two years ago, to create a new framework for social change in Pakistan, one that ensures equal opportunities and social justice for everyone and stops the exploitation of the poor and harnesses their potential.
إعلان
As the Oslo Summit on Education for Development approaches, I remain firm in my commitment to securing the right to a high-quality education for every child in Pakistan — especially for girls, who have long faced high barriers to education. But there remain considerable obstacles to fulfilling that commitment. Indeed, nearly six million Pakistani children are currently out of school, and many more are not learning even basic mathematics or reading skills. Dropout rates are high. And, perhaps worst of all, terrorists and extremists have been targeting schools, blowing up their buildings and threatening their teachers, particularly in the northern part of the country. In a particularly tragic incident last December, terrorists attacked young students and teachers at a school in Peshawar.
I now reiterate the promise that I made after that attack. My government will not allow Pakistan’s schools — so vital to our country’s future — to become targets of terrorism. Education is the most important investment we can make in our most precious assets — our children — and we will not tolerate even the slightest threat to it. Protecting schools from extremists today will help to stem the rise of extremism tomorrow. Indeed, given the contribution of ignorance, lack of choice, and socioeconomic deprivation to the rise of extremism in parts of Pakistan and Afghanistan, ensuring that future generations have better education, improved capabilities, and more opportunities will ensure that the next generation will not become easy prey for terrorist organizations.
In addition to the risk that a few would be tempted by extremism is the certainty that, if we fail to meet our commitment to universal education, millions of children would be relegated to a life of poverty and struggle, with their hopes, dreams and potential squandered, undermining the country’s development potential. More than half of Pakistan’s population is under the age of 25; theirs is the generation with the potential to drive progress and prosperity in the country — if, of course, they receive the education they deserve.
Given how unlikely it is that a free-market approach would lead to the equitable provision of education, my government has committed to increase the public resources allocated for education, which averaged only 2.4 percent of GDP from 2004 to 2013, to 4percent of GDP over the next three years. Such funding will support the steps needed to fulfill the promise, contained in our country’s constitution, that the state will “provide free and compulsory secondary education within minimum possible period.”
Those steps include cooperation with provincial governments — which bear the primary responsibility for primary and secondary education in Pakistan — to devise a roadmap for universal enrollment. In order to improve the quality of teaching and learning, we are working not only to expand facilities for teacher training, but also to draw more talented people to the profession by recognizing and honoring the service of teachers. And we are investing in computers and other advanced learning tools to ensure that our children can compete internationally.
We have also launched several new initiatives to make education more widely accessible. One such initiative is the National Endowment Scholarships for Talent, which finances the education of poor students.
Finally, we are strengthening the institutional scaffolding of Pakistan’s education system. For example, we have created the National Curriculum Council, which will standardize school curricula throughout the country, while ensuring that they are consistent with national requirements and international benchmarks. Reforms to the examination system are being introduced to complement this effort. My pledge is being turned into action. But my government cannot do it alone. To overcome the challenges we face and fulfill our promise to our children, we need active support from the international community. The Millennium Development Goal (MDG) of achieving universal primary education was expected to reach its target this year; it has not. And so now is the ideal moment for the world to renew its commitment to education.
We must approach the Sustainable Development Goals, which aim to carry on the work of the MDGs, with a clear direction, a sense of purpose, and strong resolve. For our part, we have created a SDG unit in our Ministry of Planning, Development, and Reform to coordinate their timely achievement. We hope that other countries will show the same commitment. For Pakistan, education is not merely a priority — it is a policy imperative.
—
The writer is the prime minister of Pakistan. ©Project Syndicate