Chinese President visit

Prime Minister Muhammad Nawaz Sharif hand shake with Chinese President.

Democracy WINS - Pakistan WINS!

Wall street Journal news about democratic Pakistan

PCEC map

This is the original and only map of PCEC.

Mass Transit Bus Projects

Rawalpindi Metro Project

PM meets King Salman

Pakitan stands beside Saudia for its soverignity

Reduction in fares of public transport

Toll free helpline for compaints

Parliament Gallery

Group Photo| Speaker NA Sardar Ayaz Sadiq with Dr. Cyrill Nunn, Ambassador of Germany and Members of Pakistan-Germany Parliamentary Friendship Group

News reel

Followers

Friday, March 7, 2014

Thriving industry inevitable for economic progress: Nawaz

Thriving industry inevitable for economic progress: Nawaz


Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif Thursday said that Pakistan’s progress was linked with thriving industry, and the government has been exploring new vistas to provide avenues to the business community for economic progress.
Addressing the inaugural session of the Pakistan Auto Show at the Expo Centre, he said the world exports were spreading over 216 countries but 76 percent of Pakistan’s exports were confined to only 20 countries of the world, adding that the number needed to be enhanced.
The prime minister said the award of GSP+ status by the European Union (EU) was an achievement of the PML-N government, adding the facility would provide access to 90 per cent of the Pakistani products to the EU market at zero tariff. Nawaz said the volume of Pakistani exports would be increased to 1.5 million dollars during the fiscal year 2014-15, saying the government had been working on a comprehensive strategy to expand the exports network.
The prime minister said the government’s task was to provide conducive environment for the businesses to flourish. He said if industry thrives, the whole country prospers. The prime minister said January 1972 was a black day in the economic history of the country when 32 industries were nationalised causing unprecedented loss to the economy bringing it on the verge of disaster within days.
He said the government had inherited broken economy from the previous government and every institution was on the decline, adding the PML-N government had faced the challenges with conviction and did not lose heart at any moment.
“If we lose heart, the country’s economy will face the same situation as has been the case for the last 20 years”, Nawaz stressed. The prime minister said the country was facing many challenges including terrorism, energy crisis and unemployment, asserting that thorough commitment and hard work was required to overcome these challenges. Nawaz Sharif said the government had planned many development projects in collaboration with China and efforts were being made to complete these projects within the tenure of the government.
Regarding energy projects, the prime minister said 660 MW Port Qasim and 2,200 MW civil nuclear plant projects had been launched in Karachi while work had been started on Diamir-Bhasha Dam and Basu Dam which would generate thousands of megawatt of electricity. He said the fourth expansion plan of the Tarbela Dam had been inaugurated which would generate 1,410 megawatt electricity while Neelum-Jehlum transmission line was under construction and it would be completed within the next few years.
Nawaz Sharif said the Punjab government had launched two projects of 1,300 MW, adding the government also planned to work on 2,793 megawatt hydro power projects and 21,000 MW electricity would be added to the system once all these projects were completed.
He said only 16,000 MW capability was achieved during the past 65 years and the PML-N government would add 16,000 MW more electricity to the national grid during the next five years. The prime minister said the Lahore-Karachi motorway would be started this year, adding that the feasibility of the project had been completed.
He said the life of Lahore-Islamabad motorway was 10 years but, unfortunately, no attention was paid even after 15 years by the previous regimes.
The prime minister said projects of 30 to 40 billion of rupees would be completed during the next one and half years while work was underway on the Karakorum Highway, adding that railway track from Karachi to Peshawar would also be upgraded. Nawaz Sharif said the government had finalised seven years projects worth 32.690 billion dollars with China which would attract an annual foreign investment of 4 billion dollar in the country.
Nawaz Sharif said the government was fully committed to improve law and order situation in the country. He said the nation had every right to question the past rulers regarding the sorry state of affairs about electricity and gas. The prime minister also directed Federal Finance Minister Ishaq Dar to hold a meeting with the stake-holders of the engineering industry and resolve their issues. Nawaz Sharif asked the auto show management to follow Geneva and other models for effective auto shows and maintain the same standards.


 

Tuesday, March 4, 2014

National Economy | UP UP UP ..

Early signs of economic recovery

Pakistan's moribund economy is showing ‘signs of recovery’. So claims the nine-month-old Nawaz Sharif government. Indeed, some indicators of economic health have shown improvement.
The output of large-scale industry has increased by 6.8pc on improved energy supplies to Punjab’s factories; private credit has risen from Rs53bn in the first half of the last financial year to Rs231bn, with the government claiming that much of it was for fixed investment; machinery imports are up by a hefty 26pc; overseas workers’ remittances have spiked by over 10pc to $9.03bn in seven months to January.
Tax collection registered a 17.2pc rise to reach Rs1.197 trillion; exports have also slightly grown; and inflation has decelerated.
The government says the economy expanded by more than 5pc in the first quarter of the present fiscal year. The State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) agrees, but says the overall gross domestic product (GDP) growth will be in the range of 4-5pc.
The International Monetary Fund has also upgraded its GDP growth estimates to 3.1pc from its previous forecast of 2.8pc after the second quarterly review of the country’s economic performance under its $6.7b Extended Fund Facility. Other multilateral lenders are also optimistic about higher-than-estimated growth.
The corporate sector is also upbeat about growth prospects, as manufacturers report an increase in new orders. The first Purchasing Manager Index (PMI) launched by MCB Bank last week, which is based on a survey of 200 small to large industries across Pakistan in January, depicts improvement in business confidence. The PMI, which is used to assess the direction of economic growth in the near-term the world over, says the economy is growing and creating jobs.
Conversations with several businessmen based in Lahore, Faisalabad and Karachi endorse the findings of the PMI survey. But many of these were worried over the increase in energy shortages going forwards, as well as higher cost of credit and deterioration in security conditions in the wake of the breakdown in peace talks between the government and the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan.
Some, nevertheless, say they are planning to invest in small solar and coal power generation plants because of higher margins on investment.
Yet, in spite of these ‘improvements’, some analysts believe that it will be too early to say that the decline in the economy has been arrested. “There are a number of challenges that the government needs to surmount,” says Shahid Zia, a Lahore-based financial analyst.
“We are still not sure if the government will be able to bridge the fiscal deficit, which the central bank says will remain well above the budgeted target of 6pc, despite significant cut in the development expenditure and increase in [indirect] tax collection. It all depends on the successful sale of 3G and 4G mobile phone spectrums and increase in foreign official and private inflows.”
He is not alone. A senior banker says foreign flows are crucial to reducing the fiscal and current account deficits. He says Ishaq Dar, the finance minister, had ‘talked down’ the rupee for now, but exchange rate stability is not sustainable unless the country’s foreign exchange reserves grow significantly and inflation comes down.
“You cannot artificially keep the exchange rate in control for long when your reserves have bottomed out and inflation is far above what is experienced by your trading partners.”
Some also do not see foreign or domestic investors starting to invest in the economy in a big way in the near-term. “Investment is declining,” says Ali Salman of the Islamabad-based think-tank on the market economy, the Policy Research Institute of Market Economy (Prime).
“Chinese investors have committed investment of billions of dollars in large infrastructure projects and in the manufacturing industry over the next several years, but all these promises are yet to materialise.”
People like Dr Ishrat Hussain, who as SBP Governor in the early 2000s oversaw massive domestic and foreign direct investment in the economy, cautions against forming an opinion on the basis of growth estimates of the government or recent improvements in economic fundaments. As long as we have hard data on which the government’s estimates are based, he argues, it will not be wise to make an opinion.
However, Dr Hussain, who is running the Institute of Business Administration in Karachi, says huge opportunities for investment exist, but delays in restructuring regulatory and service bodies and privatisation are adversely impacting economic expectations.
“People are waiting for the government to restructure regulatory bodies and public sector corporations to get a sense of the policy direction before bringing in their money. They’ve also put their investment plans on hold until the government starts privatising public corporations. Some of them may want to buy one of these businesses rather than invest in new projects.”
 Published in Daily Dawn dated March 03, 2014
 
 

Sunday, March 2, 2014

Interview | President PMLN Mandibahaudin


Dewan Mushtaq

This interview was published on January 20, 2013.



Wednesday, February 26, 2014

National security Policy

Approval from the Cabinet

Published in Daily Waqt dated February 26, 2014

National Security Policy

Ch Nisar Ali Khan's speech in National Assembly



Progress in PIA

Published in Daily Waqt dated February 26, 2014.

http://www.dailywaqt.com/02-26-2014/images/02_13.gif

Progress in Pakistan Railway

Published in Daily Waqt dated February 26, 2014
http://www.dailywaqt.com/02-26-2014/images/03_10.gif
http://www.dailywaqt.com/02-26-2014/images/02_06.gif

http://www.dailywaqt.com/02-26-2014/images/02_15.gif

Monday, February 24, 2014

China to invest 52 Billion USD in the next 5 years

This news report was published in daily Express dated February 24, 2014

Column

CM Shahbaz Sharif's successful tour of China

This column was published in Daily Express dated February 24, 2014.

Sea cruise to be started for pilgrimage

This newsreport was published in Daily Express dated February 24, 2014

http://express.com.pk/images/NP_LHE/20140224/Sub_Images/1102107754-2.gif

Sunday, February 23, 2014

New World Record | A tweet

Tuesday, February 18, 2014

Interview | Ch Nisar Ali Khan

Security strategy eyed to stabilize region: Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan

Tuesday, January 21, 2014 12:06 AM
Pakistan Interior Minister Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan makes a point during his interview with Okaz/Saudi Gazette’s Fahim Al-Hamid. — Courtesy photos


PAKISTAN — The security portfolio in Pakistan, no doubt, for any minister means entering a wasps’ nest. This is not due to the significance of the portfolio, but because of security diplomacy’s tough legacy.

The new government not only inherited issues from the former President Asif Ali Zardari government but also had to face situations aggravated by the complications that had followed the 9/11 attacks.

After these attacks, Pakistan saw a new wave of violence and terrorism across its borders with Afghanistan.

This wave has also consolidated terrorism in the tribal area in Pakistan, which has become a haven for Al-Qaeda leaders and the Taliban during Zardari’s reign.

Pakistan Interior Minister Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan, in his interview to Okaz/Saudi Gazette, says the security issue in Pakistan is not the country’s concern alone but is tightly linked to neighboring Afghanistan, Iran and India who are the main beneficiaries of every change in Pakistan.

This link extends to other major powers such as the US, the NATO, Russia and China.

The US and the NATO are the major beneficiaries of stability in Pakistan and at the same time the most hit by the lack of it.

They are both looking for a strategy that would enable Afghanistan and Pakistan to confront the challenges posed by Al-Qaeda and the Taliban.

Discussions are ongoing inside Pakistan especially in light of the recent initiative launched by Nawaz Sharif’s government to enter into negotiations with the Taliban.

The government has got the green signal from all the political parties for its move.

A dialogue with the Taliban is aimed at restoring the internal security and protecting Pakistan against any new wave of terrorism that may follow the withdrawal of the NATO and US forces from Afghanistan.

It is obvious that the initiative of dialogue with the Taliban is still fragile. Furthermore, this initiative has relapsed following the American drone raid in the tribal area that killed Pakistani Taliban leader Hakimullah Mehsud. The killing of Mehsud has frozen the dialogue.

Pakistan, which is searching for a prescription to establish internal security and end terrorism, does not want to wait with its hands tied for terrorism, which could come from Afghanistan after the withdrawal of the NATO and the US forces.

“With terrorism in mind, we have to frame a National Security Policy of Pakistan that will have both the strategic aspects and the operational aspects,” the Interior Minister said.

Following are the excerpts from the interview:

Q: How do you evaluate the relationship between Saudi Arabia and Pakistan?

A: Relationship between two fast, very close friends is always fruitful. As it’s not only people to people relationship but also on a common Imaan and Aqida. Saudi Arabia has the kalima shahada on the flag and Pakistan owes its origin to the kalima. It is part of your flag and is part of our Imaan. There can’t be a bigger bond than that. Whenever there has been a difficult time for Pakistan, Saudi Arabia has been the strongest supporter; and vice versa. The government of Nawaz Sharif feels that the security, well-being and the defense of Saudi Arabia is the security, well-being and defense of Pakistan. So nothing can come between us. Prince Saud Al Faisal’s recent visit was very productive, positive and I can tell you the discussions that took place were not normal diplomatic discussions. They were discussions between two brothers. They are one in soul and one in spirit and one in Imaan. I have invited Interior Minister Prince Muhammad Bin Naif to Pakistan and he will be visiting Pakistan soon.

Q: How do you view the security cooperation between the two countries at this stage?

A: Having said at the outset that security of one country is the security of the other country, it is important for Saudi Arabia and Pakistan to get together in all fields including security to try and address the issue of the region being increasingly unstable by a chain of events over the last few years and to somehow bring about some level of security in the region, which has suffered a lot over the last few years.

Q: Combating terrorism is very much high on the agenda of Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. What’s your vision to further develop relations with Riyadh?

A: We are processing a very high profile security agreement with Saudi Arabia. We have done the initial homework. And hopefully that Memorandum of Understanding would be signed on the impending visit of the Saudi Interior Minister. We have charted out certain common areas but discussions are still ongoing. The broad base is that it shares the vision of both the countries in addressing areas of terrorism, not only in the respective countries but also in the region and having a proactive role in addressing the origins of terrorism, working together to cut off their funding, working together to have a proactive policy in close cooperation including intelligence sharing to address this menace.

Q: Will this agreement include cooperation in drug trafficking, organized crime, exchange of prisoners?

A: These are three MoUs: drugs and trafficking is one, security and fighting terrorism is the second, and transfer of prisoners or offenders is the third. We are working on these three MoUs. The MoU on drugs and trafficking is almost final. The other two are in the process. Hopefully within the next few weeks we will have consensus on all three.

Q: Signing the security deal will be a very significant step. Do you think this agreement will help enhance regional security between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia since both can be main players in regional security?

A: I think relations between Saudi Arabia and Pakistan is not influenced by any third country. We have a bilateral relationship and these are bilateral MoUs. Naturally this is the first step in any improvement or any extension of the objectives of the MoUs. There are various aspects of the MoUs that have regional implications. So as you go forward, as you operate along these MoUs, naturally certain aspects of the policy regarding these MoUs will have implication for the region. So it will contribute. But what is more important is that Pakistan and Saudi Arabia must cooperate. They are important players in Middle East, in South Asia and in Islamic Ummah. So whatever they do or whatever agreement they come to, naturally, it does have fallout on the respective regions.

Q: My question was that is Pakistan willing to play a role with Saudi Arabia to maintain peace in the regional aspect?

A: That’s a difficult question. Because that has certain undertones but we are willing together to play any role to bring about peace.

Q: Can you give us what is the focus of your ministry to maintain peace in the country?


A: There are two aspects. One is strategic and other is operational. On the strategic side basically we have to decide whether the situation that prevails in Pakistan is to be handled through a military operation or is it going to be dialogue, which will pave the way for the future. The third option is a reactive mode. Pakistan has been in a reactive mode over the last many years. If there is an attack from one side then we react otherwise you go back to the status quo. That is more of a reactive or a protective policy. And the fourth one is mixture of the dialogue and … a combination. At the moment we have chosen the path of dialogue. That doesn’t mean that the other options have been marginalized. The other options are available. At this moment of time we have the resolution of the All Parties Conference, we have had intense discussions within the government and that includes both the political parties and also input from security forces. So the whole consensus at the moment is for the dialogue process. I think I can tell you I have not made public yet that there has been some significant progress in that respect but it will take few weeks before we can honestly say which way the dialogue process is going to take. We had channelized a very clear cut and a very transparent policy on the dialogue process but then one drone attack jeopardized the whole efforts, we are trying to pick up the pieces and I think it will take a few weeks before it is clear as to the way forward. On the operational side it is very, very comprehensive strategy and a very comprehensive framework. At the federal level we are basically responsible for security of the capital area and providing institutional support to the provinces. The law and order is basically the responsibility of the provinces themselves.

We provide them the institutional support in so far as intelligence support and support of the civil armed forces, the Rangers, the FC, the Coast Guards. We are trying to conceive a central Directorate of Intelligence based solely on “one-point” agenda, “terrorism”. So we are in process of announcing soon the first ever National Security Policy of Pakistan. It will have both the strategic aspects and the operational aspects so hopefully we will put all the aspects together in the shape of a comprehensive National Security Policy.

Q: What do you think about talks with Taliban? Do you think that killing of Mehsud has sabotaged these talks or there’s still room to revive it?

A: It originally sabotaged the talks. We are now faced with the situation in which the new head of this militant faction has repeatedly said that they don’t want to engage in talks. That leaves us with few options, yet we still feel that dialogue is the way forward. Military operations might have an impact in the medium- and short-term, but it is always dialogue and reconciliation that have far-reaching and long-term implication and long-reaching effect. What exactly is the strategy, it will not be really possible for me to divulge at this stage, but yes dialogue is going on even at this stage. Which are the factions, I think you will have to wait for couple of days or maybe for couple of weeks before they are made public.

Q: What’s the main objective of the talks with Taliban?

A: Basically the objective is to ensure peace within Pakistan. I think you would probably recall that before 9/11 there were never any signs of violence within Pakistan or even FATA. FATA was basically very peaceful. It was only after Gen. Musharraf decided to become part of the American coalition, the so-called War on Terror that the fallout occurred on our side of “border.” The objective of the dialogue process is to regain peace for Pakistan, not only in FATA but also in the rest of Pakistan.

Q: Are you satisfied with the security in Pakistan?

A: When we took over it was a complete mess. We have tried our utmost. We have burned the midnight oil, as I normally say in the Assembly to try and raise not only the framework of a National Security Policy but also the morale of our brave soldiers, security forces, police, who are fighting and sacrificing their lives for Pakistan but having said that it will take some time before I will be totally satisfied on that account.

Q: Do you think the suicide bombing has reduced?

A: At least in last couple of months, yes.

Q: What about the situation in Karachi? Why is it out of control?

A: It’s not out of control, the rate of heinous crimes has come down by forty percent. Yes, there are ups and downs, when the criminals are taken to task over a period then there are certain times when there are spurts of reaction. They are not consistent. It occurs suddenly. But all said and done, as I said, the crime rate as far as target killing, as far as kidnapping for ransom, as far as terrorists related incidents are concerned they have gone down by 40%. We would like to bring them down further, the biggest problem of course is that the focal point there is the provincial government, and we have to work with the provincial government, and the provincial government is controlled by the opposition party, but we are working very closely. We are trying to bring about peace.
It will take a bit of time and more efforts to ensure peace in Karachi but we are getting there. InshaAllah.

Q: In my opinion you despite being an aggressive Interior Minister are having a very soft approach towards Madrassas?

A: You can’t categorize Madrassas under one head. The general scheme of things as far as Madrassas are concerned is positive. They impart knowledge. When the governments do not have the capacity to address that particularly area of education and if the private sector comes in why should anybody react to that. It is only a very few that has somehow used the Madrassas name for militancy, and on that area of course I will come down with an iron hand and these people have misused the very concept of Madrassas. We are already on it, we have been trying to address the situation but to say that all Madrassas are terrorism incubators is the biggest fallacy. The previous government did not have the concept. They were not even aware of the situation as it existed on the ground and they were always trying to appease the foreign lobby. My responsibility is to be responsible to the Pakistan lobby, to Islam, to anybody and everybody imparting religious knowledge.
How can I differ with that? But if anybody is misusing that aspect for militancy or to create or spread terrorism, you can be rest assured that the state will come down with an iron hand.

 
 

Sunday, February 16, 2014

Puncturing the Puncture Myth

Statistical Evidence of Blunt Lies by Imran Khan

After failure of Tsunami on 11th May 2013 and losing to both PMLN and PPP, Imran Khan has been foul crying and raising many baseless allegations against the opponents, primarily PMLN.
Other than typical allegations, Imran Khan has recently claimed that a foreign ambassador told him that Najam Sethi had called Nawaz Sharif on Election Day and told Sharif that he (Najam Sethi) has put 35 punctures. Imran Khan claims that these 35 punctures are actually 35 seats that Najam Sethi rigged in favor of PMLN as Chief Minister.
Now lets analyze Imran Khan’s claim about 35 punctures:
1- The story about 35 punctures was not released by any journalist, instead it was just a statement by Imran Khan himself
2- There has been no news or statement regarding Imran Khan meeting any ambassador around when he released the puncture statement
3- Assuming the foreign ambassador told Imran Khan about this shocking information, why Imran Khan did not raise voice against spying by foreign country against state of Pakistan like he highlighted the assassination of Hakimullah Masood by foreign state?
4- Although it is almost unlikely, but assuming Najam Sethi did call Nawaz Sharif and told him about 35 punctures, could Sethi be referring to around 35 seats that PTI won causing puncture in PMLN’s mandate?
As per today’s report, Najam Sethi claimed that he would commit suicide if Imran Khan can prove that validity of his allegation of puncture. This have put the ball in Imran Khan’s court where he has to come and to give the evidence of his allegations to the nation.
The actual reason of this claim by Imran Khan is that he has been badly criticized and cornered by entire nation including his voters on the recent wave of terrorism and his support for TTP. Therefore, he is finding new ways of retaining his vote bank with giving lollipops in form of this 35-puncture joke. Unfortunately Imran Khan thinks of our youth as naïve and gullible who can be emotionally exploited without demanding any reasons/logics or questioning the credibility of his statements.
The recent episode of 35 puncture is a prime example of this phenomenon.
Now lets summarize the pre-election allegations by Imran Khan that he has been claiming since last several years to justify his failure:
- Large percentage of fake voters in voter lists
- Judiciary not free
- The election commissioner not neutral
- Low voter turnout
- Biased executive
All of these allegations were dealt with reasonable satisfaction.
- For first time in the history of Pakistan, the voter lists were prepared through computerized NADRA database with pictures/NIC numbers. The Election Commission ran vigorous campaign to urge people to verify their votes through SMS and/or through advertised locations
- Imran Khan was involved in Judicial Movement and had full trust in Judiciary
- Imran Khan welcomed the appointment of Fakhruddin Ibrahim as Chief Election commissioner
- The voter turnout on 11th May 2013 was the highest in recent history of Pakistan
- The Prime Minister and 4 Chief Ministers were proposed by PPP, who was the main opponent of PMLN in last elections. Anyone claiming “muk-muka” between PMLN and PPP must not have any doubts after witnessing the ugliest campaign on media by PPP against PMLN. Imran Khan himself met CM Najam Sethi and his expressed his confidence and trust in him in conducting free and fair elections. Unlike the federal and other 3 provinces, Punjab was the only province where the interim CM Sethi re-shuffled the entire bureaucracy of Punjab that was functioning under Shahbaz Sharif
After experiencing shameful defeat of tsunami of Imran Khan, a new wave of propaganda and allegations were raised against PMLN.
Based on the election results, the main allegation of PTI were the following:
1- PMLN put fake votes in ballot boxes to increase their votes
2- PMLN stopped verification of votes to hide their rigging
3- Army was only deployed outside polling stations, not inside
Lets start with the first issue that PMLN put fake votes in the ballot boxes. This claim is absurd due to the following facts:
1- Polling agents of every party were present inside around 50,000 polling stations guarding the ballot boxes. Every polling agent counted the vote in front of his eyes and signed the polling result sheet inside the polling station.
2- The law-and-order situation in Punjab was satisfactory and there were no no-go-areas where someone could forcibly put the votes.
3- The winning candidate in Punjab on average gets around 80,000+ votes for a National Assembly seat and around 40,000+ votes for a Provincial Assembly seat based on previous elections in 2008. The votes casted in favor of PTI were shamefully low against the claims made by tsunami.
Anyone with basic knowledge and experience of Pakistani politics know that rigging or fake votes can possibly play a part (if any) in close contest in that particular constituency. This is the primary reason why Election Commission allows re-counting of votes in constituencies where winning margin is very low, typically a couple of thousand, or in most cases, few hundred votes only. Re-polling on some polling stations can also be done due to law-and-order situation on those particular polling stations only.
Here are some interesting statistics that should highlight the reasons behind failure of PTI.
1- On 55 NA seats in Punjab, PTI’s candidates had their security deposit forfeited (“Zamanat Zabat”). This means that tsunami could not even secure 12.5% (1/8) votes in the 40% constituencies in Punjab. This excludes seats where PTI even failed to field candidates. Is it PMLN’s fault that PTI could not even secure minimum votes to save their security deposit and avoid this humiliation on 40% seats of Punjab? Were all tsunami supporters also busy in puncturing in favor of PMLN?
2- Some examples of collapse of tsunami in Punjab include NA64 where PTI got only 4.9% votes, NA65 4.7%, NA67 3.1%, NA74 2.5% (this is neighbor constituency of Mianwali where Imran Khan won), NA90 1.2%, NA100 3.5%, NA101 5.8%, NA102 3.2%, NA137 5.2%, NA138 7.2%, NA145 7.2%, NA146 7.3%, NA147 5.1%, NA174 3.2%, NA176 5.2%, NA179 4.6%, NA180 1.4%, NA187 0.19%, NA188 0.9% votes only etc
3- The closest contest in Punjab where margin of winning was less than 2,000 votes was only on 3 seats. On all these 3 seats, PMLN was the losing party. These were the easiest seats where Sethi could have applied “so called puncture” in favor of PMLN, but it didn’t happen. These 3 seats were NA59 with margin of 465 votes, NA188 with margin of 1,275 and NA192 with margin of just 1,291 votes.
4- There is a not a single seat where PTI lost with a margin of less than 2,000 votes where Sethi’s (so called) puncture could have come to effect to favor PMLN. Similarly, there are only 2 seats where PTI lost with a margin of less than 5,000 votes and there are only 4 seats where PTI lost with a margin of less than 10,000 votes. So in total, (so called) puncture could have helped PMLN in maximum 4 seats only.
5- Lets analyze the solid and convincing winning margin of PMLN against PTI in Punjab:
- There are 17 seats where PMLN won with margin of more than 90,000 votes against PTI
- 36 seats where PMLN beat PTI with margin of more than 80,000 votes
- 51 seats where margin is greater than 70,000 votes
- 81 seats with margin of more than 50,000 votes
- 97 seats with winning margin of more than 40,000 votes
- 114 seats where PMLN won with convincing margin of more than 20,000 votes
Now lets assume that Sethi provided a massive puncture of 20,000 fake votes on each constituency in favor of PMLN, then there are only 12 seats where PMLN could have won due to rigging against the opponents. Contrary to the claims of Imran Khan, there is no way Sethi could have rigged 35 seats in favor of PMLN. In order to rig 35 seats, Sethi would had to rig with unimaginable and impossible votes of 60,000 fake votes per constituency.
Now remember that on Election Day, the voting was overall peaceful and also confirmed by independent media. We should not forget that in 2008, the media was not free and it was gagged under Musharraf’s emergency. This election also experienced a very high voter turnout and PTI was claiming their victory in bringing out the youth in massive numbers until 5pm. If there was a massive rigging where 60,000 fake votes were being casted in 35 constituencies, then there is no way that it could have been hidden from eyes of the media, which was heavily inclined towards PTI during the entire election campaign.
Now coming to the other 2 allegations of Imran Khan related to vote verification and army deployment, Imran Khan is deliberately misleading his supporters.
1- PMLN as government has no role or saying in verification of votes. The responsibility of any verification solely lies with the Election Commission or the Courts.
2- The Election Commission has refused to entertain PTI’s request for vote verification since PTI could not provide any solid evidence of rigging by PMLN.
3- The Election Commission has also refused for recounting, as the margin of winning by PMLN is considerably large.
4- During the first by-elections in August 2013, the army was deployed both inside and outside of polling stations as per PTI’s demands and yet PMLN secured the largest number of seats in those elections. Not only that, but Imran Khan lost 2 of his own seats from Mianwali and Peshawar. There was no Sethi and PTI was running its own government in KPK, yet their own tsunami collapsed in Peshawar and Haripur.
The above arguments and statistical data should be able to convince anyone with reasoning that there was no such thing as historic rigging that stopped PTI from coming to power. Imran Khan cannot use the rigging mantra for next 5 years and must show his performance in KPK to win hearts and minds of his followers.